Antiwar

The antiwar website represents Libertarian individuals who believe in non-interventionism and are opposed to imperialism and, most importantly, war. The mission statement explains that the nature of the State "includes an ever increasing threat to individual liberty and the centralization of political power." 

The founders of the website value transparency with their viewers and want to reach through to their audience past the media filters and censorship. This media censorship makes it difficult for people on the internet to come across information that spreads a certain message.

The government can control these online filters, especially on social media, therefore controlling what information citizens are taking in. This is dangerous because it opens the door to government manipulation and scheming.

Antiwar.com is aware that its website may get filtered because of its exposure of government agendas, but nonetheless, it is passionate to "reveal the truth about America's foreign policy". The website aims to keep it's audience, everyone around the world, informed about the overseas plans of the American government.

This is exactly why antiwar websites are not in mainstream news. They reveal the government's actions and intentions that they prefer to keep under wraps. This article, "Whose Views Made the News? Media Coverage and the March to War in Iraq" mentions how the government manipulated public opinion before the 2003 war in Iraq by not offering a diverse set of perspectives on military action in Iraq through news outlets. 

As a result, the public was fed a higher rate of pro-war information and couldn't properly evaluate the situation from a neutral perspective. This helped the Bush administration go through with the war with less opposition from the American people.

Overall, antiwar websites and outlets are tougher to come across in the media because the message opposes the government's agenda. It is important for citizens to intake news from a variety of sources and perspectives to fairly weigh out different arguments. However, media censorship makes this highly difficult.